Pacific Grove Unified School
District
Note: This web page is a copy of the minutes from the Board of
Education Meeting.
Minutes are NOT OFFICIAL until approved by the Board.
The official Minutes are available at the Board Office.
Address any questions to the Superintendent, Dr. Ralph Porras, or call the District Office at 831-646-6510.
PACIFIC GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 16, 2006
The Board of Education of the Pacific Grove Unified School District held a meeting on March 16th at Robert Down Elementary School.
I. OPENED BUSINESS
A. Called to Order 6:00 p.m.
B. Roll Call President: Beth Shammas
Clerk: Jessie Bray
Members Present: Richard Schramm
Bill Phillips
Mike Niccum
Administration Present: Patrick Perry
Robin Blakley
Student Board Member Present: Creston Whiting-Casey
C. Adopted Agenda
Perry presented an item for consideration on the Consent Agenda regarding a High School field trip.
MOTION (Bray/Niccum) to adopt agenda as amended
Public comment: none
Motion CARRIED 5-0 to adopt agenda as amended
D. Identified Closed Session Topics
a. Superintendent/Assistant Superintendent Goals (TPO Report)
b. Meeting with Chief Negotiator Patrick Perry regarding Confidential employees and Administrative Staff.
E. Public comment on Closed Session items: none
F. Adjourned to Closed Session 6:05 p.m.
II. CLOSED SESSION
III. RECONVENED IN OPEN SESSION 7:00 p.m.
Reported on action taken in Closed Session
No action was taken on any of the Closed Session items; Board agreed to reconvene in Closed Session following Regular Board meeting.
a. Superintendent/Assistant Superintendent Goals (TPO Report)
b. Meeting with Chief Negotiator Patrick Perry regarding Confidential employees and Administrative Staff.
B. Pledge of Allegiance pledge recited
IV. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Written Communication
Schramm received a letter from Christine Conneau, High School Instructional Assistant in support of teachers at the High School.
Perry received an invitation from County Superintendent Bill Barr regarding this year’s meeting of the County School Boards Association.
B. Board Member Comments
Whiting–Casey reported that the High School is putting on “West Side Story” and invited everyone to go see it. “As President of Pacific Grove High School and as the Student Board member of the Pacific Grove Unified School District, I am proud to announce that with the outstanding work of ASB and with the approval of our Principal, Mr. Dodd, our open campus proposal has finally been put under consideration by the Board. This process has taken well over a year and has been revised by comments from board members, parents, students, and the community. Every single aspect of this proposal has been negotiable. ASB and the students honor the belief that “The Prospect of Pacific Grove High School being an Open Campus is not a right; it’s a privilege, and a privilege that is gained by hard and outstanding work, but can also just as easily be taken away.” I am proud of my fellow students who have stood beside me for this cause and I hope I have done my best for them. But, I want you to know, that, If we are given this privilege and it gets abused, I will not question the board about closing the campus again. In fact, I will even stand with you about that if needed. At this very moment, the students need your trust in this endeavor and your decision tonight will greatly affect how much trust you really have for the students in their eyes. I don’t want this to become a policy without a trial period, I have done my best to get the students open campus and their job is to prove to you that we are adults, just as our ESLR’s wants us to be. Lastly, open campus privileges will be given to those who earned it and those who display the honorable qualities of what P G H S students are really made of. If you, the Trustees of the Board of Education of the Pacific Grove Unified School District allot a trial period for the students, we will prove to you how trustworthy we really are, if we haven’t already. Thank you so much for taking the time to listen to the students, as they appreciate that, more than anything.”
Phillips commented that he is proud of the effort and determination that Whiting–Casey has put forth on behalf of the Open Campus Proposal.
Schramm thanked everyone from Robert Down for hosting the Board’s meeting at their school. He also thanked everyone from the High School who assisted in completing the WASC, that he knows a lot of time and effort went into the project.
Bray extended her appreciation to everyone in attendance at Robert Down. It was encouraging to see so many people in the audience. She also enjoyed attending some of the WASC meetings, especially hearing the final reports.
Shammas said the WASC study was a good benchmark for the District.
C. Superintendent Report
Perry informed the Board that there is a City/District meeting coming up. Perry and Bray are attending the March 24 Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce luncheon and other Board members are also invited to attend.
V. INDIVIDUALS DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD
There was no one present who wanted to speak at this time.
VI. PRESENTATION
Principal Linda Williams welcomed the Board to Robert H. Down Elementary School, and introduced teachers, parents and students who spoke about various projects and activities.
Honor Gallagher–Small, parent, identified herself as a “garden tender” and talked about the many projects in the garden courtyard with the water fountain, growing fruits, vegetables, and flowers and the mural created by parents and students. She invited everyone to visit the bird and butterfly friendly area.
Jean McLean and Mary–Beth Rinehart talked about the many successes that have taken place in the Learning Center. They see the space as always changing to meet the changing needs of the students. They are also grateful to have a full time psychologist at the school. Rinehart, speaking on behalf of Title 1, thanked the Board for all their help.
Judy Wills presented a demonstration of 2nd graders using the “Tools for Success” program to learn memorization of basic math facts. She said the process enables students to gain self confidence while improving their math skills.
Nancy Spade talked about the successes everyone is enjoying with Scott Purdy’s writing program.
Nan Johnson School Site Council member, talked about the Otter Times newsletter which keeps everyone informed, the Otter Loveliness project on Valentine’s Day which provided money to purchase a redwood tree in honor of Arbor Day. The dead tree that was dug up and replaced by the redwood, was placed in the school lobby and decorated by the children.
Sherry Goldman, PTA President, praised the parents at Robert Down for being socially and environmentally conscious and acknowledged how they volunteer to help students with art when there is no teacher, that the PTA is committed to helping teachers and students any way they can. Recent projects included giving 5th graders calendars, providing teachers with warrants to purchase any educational materials they need for their classrooms, and serving cookies.
Sabrina Riffle Student Council President, talked about the “I caught you doing something good” project that awards students with a lunch date with the Principal. Since February 1st, 127 students have been acknowledged.
Georgia Booth and Sue Erickson talked about the difficulties of teaching with fragmented schedules and the difficulties in maintaining a cohesive classroom environment with so many “push–ins” and “pull–outs.” The best time for pull–outs would be outside the regular day’s schedule.
Linda Jones and Carolyn Hawes highlighted the features of the school’s website (www.robertrdown.org) which contains the newsletter, downloadable forms, lunch menu, calendar, and teacher pages,
Adam Kershner and Shira Kershner, students who participate in the After School Enrichment Program, talked about all the things they have learned.
Ingrid Tower, teacher in the After School Enrichment Program, talked about the Ballroom Dancing class and the transferable skills that students learned through partner dancing. Students demonstrated their dancing skills.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of January 26, 2006 Board of Education Regular Meeting
B. Minutes of February 2, 2006 Board of Education Regular Meeting
C. Minutes of February 16, 2006 Board of Education Regular Meeting
D. Minutes of March 2, 2006 Board of Education Regular Meeting
E. TPO Human Resources, Additional Services
F. Warrant Schedule No. 450
G. Revolving Cash Report No. 7
H. Cash Receipts Report No. 7
I. Approval of Contract for Writing Program Services – Scott Purdy
J. Approval of the ROP Program Joint Powers Agreement for 2006-2007
K. Certificated Assignment Order #12
L. Classified Assignment Order #12
M Approval of Contract for Services from Balance 4 Kids to Provide Inclusion Aides
N. Approval of Contract for Services from Tucci Learning Solutions
O. Contract for Consultation with Central Coast Language and Learning Center
P. Resolution of Petitioner’s Request, Student #99689
Q. Out of State or Overnight Activities (added item)
Shammas asked that the phrase “….without involving the number of minutes.” be deleted from her comments on page 3-E (2–16–06, Information/Discussion, Item B: Instructional Minutes)
MOTION (Niccum/Bray) to approve Consent Agenda as amended.
Public comment: none
Motion CARRIED 5 – 0
VIII. INFORMATION/DISCUSSION
A. Sub Committee Reports
Community Human Services
Perry was unable to attend the recent meeting and will forward the minutes when they are sent to him.
City/District
Bray reported that she and Niccum will join the Superintendent in meeting with the City Manager and Mayor on March 20th to explore areas of common interest.
Negotiations
Nothing to report
ROP
Perry reported that several legislative proposals were introduced at the recent meeting along suggestions for budget items. There is a concern that the federal government is eliminating the Perkins funds which will affect future programs.
Wellness Committee
Shammas said she will discuss the committee’s progress when the Board item is discussed.
B. 2006/07 Budget Revenue, Expenditure Projections and Budget Assumptions
Blakley discussed the additional items that have been added to the proposed budget since the last meeting, the difficulty in estimating property tax projections prior to the availability as assessed value information in August, the increased compensation adjustments and the upswing of special education costs of approximately $100,000. He said he wanted to alert the Board to the fact that with the current budget assumptions the 2006–07 budget is projected to be in a negative balance situation that will need to be corrected.
Phillips supported splitting the difference between the current property tax projection and a projection that assumes an increase of 2% more and allocating the funds needed to cover the increased special education costs into the budget. He asked if we have other staffing options. He would like to see a list of possible reductions and understands that the District would lose the State matching funds if we did not contribute to the deferred maintenance fund.
Niccum said that he did not foresee a problem with going with the higher property tax projection but to maintain a property tax reserve. There is the potential in this community that the property taxes might flatten out and it would be good to have a reserve. Maintenance is a critical issue since the District is going to be asking the community for bond money to maintain our capital improvements.
Bray wanted to find a good middle ground – to project a higher property tax increase but for only one year. She also stated that the District has a responsibility to maintain the deferred maintenance program.
Schramm agreed with the one year, wants to keep a prudent reserve, agreed this is a more sound way to deal with the property tax assumptions.
Shammas said the increasing special education costs need to be more visible, and proposed creating a separate special education category outside the Consent Agenda. She suggested making the format change for next school year. At one time the Consent Agenda did not include any item over $10,000, would like to reinstate that as well with next year’s format change.
Staffing was discussed and Blakley said that the District factors in a midrange compensation for replacements of retired staff, then adjusts accordingly as positions are filled. Community High School staffing was discussed and Blakley said it is better to build in an allocation of funding for the 2.0 FTE if they want to have the option of staffing at this level.
Perry said that at the April 6th meeting, he will be giving the Board a list of courses available that students will have selected and from this list a Master Schedule will be built, that flexibility is limited.
Phillips said he is concerned that the only way to make this work is to recognize that 85% of the budget is tied up in compensation and staffing issues which must be addressed.
Public Comment:
Susan Nine, PGTA Co–President, said she shares Mr. Phillips’s concerns that there is a misunderstanding about reducing sections; once a position is assumed to be there, it will be filled, and there is no way to turn back once you’ve filled positions at a school. This year the District is looking at six retirements, some are part-time; on the staffing issue, it is important to remember that once notices go out, the District cannot later move backwards.
Shammas is concerned in preserving programs at the Community High, that having 1.5 teachers does not support that program.
Perry suggested that instead of dealing with each budget item in isolation, time would be better spent if the Board met at another time to strategically discuss staffing.
C. Wellness Policy and Regulations 5030 – First Reading
Phillips said he thought the policy and regulations were well assembled but he questioned the feasibility of enforcing what food would be used for celebrations: can we control or limit what is served at classroom parties?
Bray said she is glad to see a document that is so coherent, that something needs to be done to improve students’ awareness of healthy eating,
Schramm questioned (under School–sponsored Events) “The District will prohibit commercial influences in school, such as selling access to students in the school setting for commercial purposes” as being in conflict with advertising at the High School for team sponsorships; and (under Physical Education) “All physical education will be taught by credentialed physical education teachers.”
Bray commented that having credentialed teachers for P.E. has been a component in the District for many years, that when she was a teacher, classrooms were self–contained and that she was credentialed to teach physical education.
Public Comment:
Anne Hall: “I have a sophomore at the high school. I also chair the Sober Grad Night committee. There are at least 21 groups at PGHS that will be financially impacted by this policy. The Junior class has traditionally raised money via bake sales and candy sales for Prom. Valentine Cookie Grams have been a regular event every February. The Spanish Club and French Club, ASB, Music Boosters, leadership and Theater are all supported to some degree by food and beverage sales. At the Rotary Meet on April 29th we open the snack bar and sell various food items. This is the only fundraiser Track has throughout the year. We sell soda and baked goods in addition to other items. Where will the money come from if these types of sales are banned? Is the district willing and financially able to fund the various organizations? Regarding the increased minutes for PE, what will the cost be for additional staffing? At the high school, is the district going to bring the shower facilities up to standard and supply towels for the students? Currently, students at PGHS can meet their PE requirements in their first two years. What will this change mean to students’ schedules? If the minutes requirement is increased, students should get credit for extracurricular sports, as they do at Carmel. What about Sober Grad Night? We have students in the gym from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. As the policy is currently written, we wouldn’t be able to serve soda or many of the snack and food items that are traditionally donated by parents and the community. I urge the Board to carefully consider what the costs will be to implement this policy. And then, where will the funds come from to replace the traditional fundraisers that will be banned if this policy is passed. Thank you.”
Robert Kershner said it is important for the Board to be sending to out the right message about wellness to students and all members of the community. Using food as prizes sends the wrong message. It is a difficult situation to resolve, and it will cost money to resolve, but the wrong message is to have our children sell junk to raise money.
“My name is Barbara Kiely. I have lived in the district since my son was in first grade. He is now a freshman at the high school. I am here tonight to speak as a board member on behalf of the Breakers Club. The Breakers Club is a non–profit fund–raising organization. Our sole purpose is to fund PGHS Athletics because the District is financially unable to do so. This coming fall, the Breaker Club will increase its annual donation to the Athletic Department From $20,000 to $25,000. The money is used to support the 16+ sports offered to PGHS students – boys & girls tennis, swimming, volleyball, football, boys & girls basketball, softball, baseball, cross country, track, lacrosse, wrestling, golf, cheer and the dance team. The Athletic Department, with the exception of football receives no other funding to buy and replace equipment, uniforms and other items that our athletes need to safely and effectively compete in the MTAL. The Breakers club is able to make this annual donation because of the many tireless volunteers that supply and work concessions at every home football and basketball game. As all of you know, PGHS home games are truly a community event that attracts current and former students and families, neighbors and just about anyone who works or lives in PG. I’ve sold burgers, nachos, soda or candy to most of you or your family members. You have seen first hand the hard work of the volunteers and the widespread support of the community which make the Breaker Club concessions very popular and very profitable for PGHS Athletics. We have carefully reviewed the proposed wellness program/policy and SB–12 and SB–965. The proposed wellness program/policy would impose the food and beverage standards of BS–12 and SB–965 on Breaker Club concessions. However, neither law requires this. In fact, both SB–12 and SB–965 expressly permit non–compliance with these standards provided the food and beverage sales occur during school–sponsored activities that take place after the end of the school day. Therefore, consistent with SB–12 and SB–965, the Breaker Club requests that it be exempted from the food and beverage standards of the proposed wellness program/policy. Thank you.”
Adrian Schueneman, High School teacher, said she is a former food service director with a BA in Foods and Nutrition. She finds the policy flawed, that it does not address the student issue, it is written punitively and says in essence that all food is bad. Food is a very positive necessity of our lives; how can we educate our children not to see food as bad? Under “Rewards,” who determines the nutritional value? Under “Celebrations” the regulation eliminates the possibility of cross-cultural education or historical education, (no Thanksgiving). Moderation and variety are keys to healthy eating.
Debi Page said she echoed the sentiments of many of the speakers. Educating children is the Board’s role, she understands the Board wants the children to make good choices. The policy is restrictive as it tries to put restrictions in place that cannot be enforced. The biggest concern is the huge fiscal impact; the Board should not put this policy and regulations in place without having a back up. Putting something in place that cannot be enforced is a waste of time, effort and paper.
Carolyn Boggan said she agrees that nutrition is important, but the District cannot enforce what parents feed their children. If the Board is going to increase time spent for physical education, then they need to bring showers at the High School up to standard. She understands the intent but the way it is written is not right.
Janice McKinney thanked Barbara Kiely for explaining about the impact on Breakers. “Don’t tie the hands of the people in the community who are trying to raise the money.” She encouraged the Board to make an exception regarding after school activities the way they did in Carmel, and encouraged giving physical education credits for extra-curricular activities as well as cheer leaders.
Board Response
Shammas acknowledged that she knew the policy was going to generate controversy and that the Board is willing to hear suggestions and make adjustments, but they cannot support giving junk food. She believes that the policy as it stands is doable but there can be some compromise. The original idea was to start a trend, that it began with parents of elementary school students, and was also a response to the State’s new requirements and requests.
Bray said she is willing to engage in a vigorous debate, but once the vote is taken, we must support the majority. This is only the first reading. She encouraged the public to let the Board know what your concerns are. She welcomes an open, honest debate.
Niccum said the Board should be reaching out to the after school extra curricular events as an opportunity to slowly evolve the focus on healthy eating.
Shammas asked the audience to please fill out the Wellness Policy 5030 Input form to provide feedback for further discussion.
Phillips asked staff to provide information to the Board about what is legally mandated and what is not.
Schramm thanked the Food Service Committee for working so diligently with all the Education Codes to ensure the policy and regulations were all inclusive. He is aware that every school district is having to deal with this issue. The Board must approve the policy and regulations by June. He is aware that there are many food products that meet SB–19 standards.
IX. ACTION/DISCUSSION
A. Approval of PGTA Contract Proposal for 2005–06
Perry recommended that the Board approve the Table Agreement.
MOTION (Niccum/Bray) to approve the Table Agreement.
Public comment: none
Motion CARRIED 5 – 0
B. Monterey Bay Charter School Petition Resolution #775
Perry said that the report submitted to the Board regarding the Monterey Bay Charter School Petition was in two parts: observations made by a visiting team and a financial review from the Business Office.
MOTION (Bray/Schramm) to adopt Resolution #775
Public comment: none
Motion CARRIED 5 – 0
C. 2006/2007 School Calendar
Blakley said the calendar is similar to the one used for the 2005–06 school and represents the collaborative efforts of both associations. The notation below the calendar needs to be changed to reflect that there are now 183 days for Certificated staff (and 184 days for new teachers).
MOTION (Bray/Schramm) to approve the 2006–07 school calendar with changes
Public comment: none
Motion CARRIED 5 – 0
D. High School Open Campus Proposal
Phillips asked what the time frame would be for implementing the open campus.
Dodd responded they were planning on implementing the policy after Spring Break.
Phillips asked how difficult it would be to enforce freshmen from leaving.
Dodd responded that he and the ASB leadership are still discussing the matter.
Phillips asked about truancies. Buller responded that the truancy policy is strictly enforced.
Shammas said that when the campus was closed, the Board at that time said they would offer many recreational needs during lunch for the students.
Dodd said that at lunch time on any day the Library is filled with students studying. PGHS is the fourth high school he has worked at and it has the most ASB–sponsored activities of them all.
Schramm thanked Whiting–Casey and the ASB for their cooperation in revising the proposal to address other issues that were of concern to the Board.
Niccum asked if there was any parent feedback.
Dodd responded that a letter was sent to parents informing them that the Open Campus Proposal was on the agenda for the March 16th Board meeting and they were invited to attend and speak to the Board on the matter. The Proposal is also posted on the High School web site. And there was an article in the November newsletter.
Shammas was concerned about how the High School will regulate who goes and who stays and what impact will students leaving during lunch have on the food services program. She does not see opening the campus at lunch time as a trust issue and said that the final document is a watered down version of the original.
Schramm noted that the watered down version is the result of ASB leadership attempting to respond to the Board’s requests. The Board asked students to be responsible and they responded with the high ESLR’s so to not approve the open campus is a slap in the face. They have worked hard to bring this forward to this process.
Phillips said he agrees that the students have adequately addressed the Board’s concerns and opening the campus on a trial basis is the right thing to do.
Niccum acknowledged all the effort that has been put into the open campus proposal and how it has motivated the students. He feels it is reasonable to do it on a trial basis.
Shammas said it has provided the students with a good exercise in trying to motivate a governing body. She sees this as a safety issue and asked how staff is going to regulate.
Whiting–Casey said that it’s one thing if they could not handle the responsibility; but you need to give them a chance the prove it.
Perry reiterated that the open campus is a privilege and not a right. A suggestion for the Board would be to open the campus for an incremental period of time, perhaps a quarter and based on a set of criteria that would demonstrate their ability to be responsible, unless the proposal is formally renewed, the campus goes back to being closed.
Anne Hall praised Whiting–Casey’s writing, and said that the perception in her house was that open campus was a promise to the students to do better at testing, that it would be bad faith for the Board not to grant open campus on a trial basis. The key provision is that the student must have parental permission.
Lillian Griffith said “we made a deal with these kids, this was our only incentive to motivate them on the STAR tests.” She recalled that only 20 parents were behind closing the school in 1980 and safety was not a factor. “You owe these kids open campus.” The social aspect of campus is big, new amphitheater is gong to give them a place to hang out. All students realize this is a test.
Robert Kershner is glad the matter has finally come to a vote, that it’s been a long hard trip. As a reward, its better than a candy bar. California employment law requires him to give his staff a 30 minute break every day. There is no law requiring a break for students, give the students a break.
Hollis Whiting said “It is an important thing for kids that we give them our trust, and support them in what they are going to be when the grow up. We are preparing these children for the future. We have an opportunity to support them in a trial experiment and we can always change our mind. There is nobody here tonight who is against the proposal. They will either prove themselves or not.”
Peter Casey said he used to have no room or time for kids in his life. But now as a coach, his team always reaches the playoffs. Adults can look down on young people or help them get to a higher level.
Shammas said her concerns about safety are because she works with kids on probation. Many young people are at risk and she worries that when they leave the campus they will be doing drugs, drinking alcohol and so on. She wants them to grow up to be responsible and she sees that her role as a Board member is to provide that safety for those kids.
Schramm said he hears that Shammas is speaking from her heart, but the job of the District is to educate, and providing safety is a decision parents face everyday as to how much risk a they should let their children take. As parents, they can also fail their children by not helping them learn to take their own steps.
MOTION (Schramm/Phillips) to create an open campus policy for the 4th quarter of the 2005–06 school year as a test of the open campus proposal as presented here tonight. If the Board takes no further action, then the campus will revert to a closed one for the 2006–07 school year.
Public Comment:
Perry suggested the Board receive status reports about the progress of the open campus.
Motion CARRIED 4 – 1
MOTION (Bray/Niccum) to approve implementation of open campus for a trial period as stated in this Board packet and suspend Board Policy 5112.5.
Motion CARRIED 4 – 1
At 9:55 p.m. MOTION (Bray/Schramm) to extend the meeting no later than 11:00 p.m.
Motion CARRIED 5 – 0.
E. Addendum of Board Regulation 5020 – Second Reading
Perry said the addendum adds legal requirements so a survey can be sent out to parents regarding their child completing the health survey. This survey has been administered in the past, asking for a passive response and what is different this year is that the survey includes new questions.
MOTION (Schramm/Bray) to approve addendum.
Public comment: none
Motion CARRIED 5 – 0.
F. Pacific Grove Unified School District Library Improvement Plan, 2005–2006
Carolyn Hawes thanked the Board members who attended the WASC. She highlighted budgeted input items from the Library Improvement Plan and asked that the Board fund the District libraries with money from SB 825 before the money goes out to the school sites.
Perry commended Hawes on the tremendous improvements that she has made with the High School Library, and said that “she has made the Library her reality.”
To Schramm’s question about SB 825, Blakley replied that the small amount of State Library funds of about $2,000 were combined with the school improvement fund and that if the money requested is given to the libraries, then there will be less available for school SIP programs.
MOTION (Bray/Niccum) to accept the Library Improvement Plan with the intent to consider adding the funding requested in the development of the 2006–07 budget.
G. Board Calendar/Future Meetings
March 23rd – Special Study Session on budget considerations, District Office, 6:30 p.m.
MOTION (Schramm/Shammas) to add meeting to Board calendar.
Motion CARRIED 5 – 0
H. Future Agenda Items
Review Core Values
Review High School Open Campus pilot and reinstatement of Policy 5112.5
X. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Safety Plan Allocation
Staffing and Enrollment Projections, 2006–07
Format of Board items
Approval to Create Utility/Driver Position
State Preschool Initiative
XI. ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION 10:55 p.m.
XII. RECONVENED IN CLOSED SESSION 10:56 p.m.
XIII. REPORTED ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
Reported on action taken in Closed Session
a. Superintendent/Assistant Superintendent Goals (TPO Report)
No action taken
b. Meeting with Chief Negotiator Patrick Perry regarding Confidential employees and Administrative Staff.
No action taken
XIV. ADJOURNED 11:00 p.m.
minutes/0506/031606min.html